Which of these is the best?? - bushnell elite 3200 10 x 40
Please place the arms and the following in order of best (1) to very poor (10 or less) ...
Or, if you have suggestions, we ask them!
Rifles (all 30-06):
Remington 700 SPS --
Remington-7600
110-Savage
Stevens Model 200
Ruger M77R MKII --
Marlin XL7C
Mossberg Model 100 ATR
Remington-770
Zone:
Hunter 3-9x50mm Leupold
Hunter 3-9x40mm Leupold
Bushnell Elite 3200 3-10x50mm
Bushnell Elite 3200 3-10x40mm
-Bushnell Elite 3200 3-9x40mm
-Bushnell Legend 3-9x50
Nikon Monarch 8-SF 32x50ED
In the areas that you recommend as far as zoom and Aperature? 40 or 50 mm, 3-10, 3-9, etc. ..
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Bushnell Elite 3200 10 X 40 Which Of These Is The Best??
2 comments:
Wow, what do you do with them?
Why? Hunting?
You have to discover a list of some good weapons here that your AT, and then decide which are best.
Just as a good source of information, Remington by many (including me) as the price damn accurate and correct a gun.
Leupold Can not be beat for quality and warranty. I bet that would ensure an employee with tire tracks on them!
More Aperature the best collection of light.
be the rest of the variables, the scope is versitle.
"Hunting eyes on high power, then" if you have a high power setting for hunting, shooting can be lost in the skin
30.06 is a great round. (30 Cal-changed in 1906)
I type my Ruger, M77 is the start safer and usually lead with a goal, pushed for the violation of your local area. As for the fields, you can not beat Leupold. and 50 mm for the front lens low light, if you tend to see the deer.
Post a Comment